Representing probabilistic data via ontological models — mentioned by alphydan

Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:49:05 GMT

Could it be that you're not prepared for "What is really happening"? It seems like you'r expecting that QM's unintuitive properties will go away with a better theory. They may, but it doesn't have to be that way. It may just be that reality at that scale is not made of trajectories, balls, and simple causality. As evolved monkeys with 5 senses we are used to intuitive concepts like continuity, predictions, trajectories, objects. Now imagine a world 1,000,000 times smaller. Will it behave, look and feel the same way? Maybe. Let's shrink it 10,000 times again. Now we are at the size of an atom.…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Representing probabilistic data via ontological models · HackerPapers discussions

Representing probabilistic data via ontological models — mentioned by alphydan