<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Lorentz Invariance Violation from String Theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0708.2250/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0708.2250/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Lorentz Invariance Violation from String Theory — mentioned by noone_important</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41094643</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0708.2250:41094643</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 17:38:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Just because they are not mainstream, you definitely can have lorentz violation in string theory [0]. Spontaneous symmetry breaking can lead to induced finsler geometries, which can basically have multiple light cones (when there was the &amp;quot;faster than light neutrinos&amp;quot; result on the table. Some people used finsler spacetime to explain them). So you made your prediction only by choosing an axiom. There is a reason that even some proponents of string theory call it the theory of anything. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.2250&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0708.2250/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
