<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The power of quantum systems on a line · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0705.4077/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0705.4077/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The power of quantum systems on a line — mentioned by selimthegrim</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7079771</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0705.4077:7079771</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 02:31:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No. Only for one-dimensional systems can classical systems approximate quantum ones to arbitrary accuracy. The resulting technique is known as DMRG. (Although there is some crazy 12-dimensional corner case with adiabatic quantum computation I recall hearing about [1], it&amp;#x27;s totally irrelevant to most simulation in general and especially the sort you are talking about, unless you know of a classical way to find the ground state of all 1-D spin glasses, in which case there are a lot of people at UCSB who would be very excited to talk to you.) [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.4077&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0705.4077/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
