<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The collision velocity of the bullet cluster in conventional and modified dynamics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0704.0381/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0704.0381/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The collision velocity of the bullet cluster in conventional and modified dynamics — mentioned by naasking</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38533629</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0704.0381:38533629</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 17:05:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The Bullet Cluster is a particular instance where we can actually &amp;quot;see&amp;quot; the dark matter flying around, in a way MOND couldn&amp;#x27;t hope to explain This is not correct. In fact, LCDM can&amp;#x27;t even explain the Bullet Cluster [1]. The evidence is not so favourable to LCDM over MOND [2] when taken as a whole. More recent observations on wide binary stars disfavour MOND more strongly, but the classic reasons you cite are not valid reasons. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0381 [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06936 Edit: See for instance what Milgrom said about the Bullet Cluster back in 2006…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0704.0381/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
